Ask HN: When a post of yours does well, do you know why?

When something I write gets an unusual amount of attention, I can always produce an explanation afterwards. Hook, timing, format, topic, the audience being in the right mood. But I can produce an explanation for the ones that got no attention too, which makes me suspect I am pattern matching on noise.

For those of you who post regularly, in any venue: do you think you know what causes the outliers? And has anyone managed to reproduce one deliberately?

5 points | by john_builds 1 day ago

6 comments

  • dnemmers 1 day ago
    Is this a fact finding journey to help your AI 'social media' startup?
  • ymolodtsov 1 day ago
    To be honest, no. In fact, the posts that I thought would be the most interesting don't get much attention.

    It's something I drafted in a single evening that suddenly gets into top-3 traffic acquirers for my blog.

  • austin-cheney 1 day ago
    Why don’t you answer that for me. My outlier for today was this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49121138

    What made that one special?

    I never expected this one to be upvoted well over 100 times: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47849520

  • chistev 1 day ago
    It's a function of title of submission and time of submission.

    Sometimes you post at the right time for people to see it and it gathers enough attention to hit the front page. Once it's on the front page, and if it's a really good submission, it can stay there for hours.

    But, you really can't tell which submission will be a hit or not. The ones you're certain will blow up can go unnoticed.

  • brazukadev 17 hours ago
    if you know how to do it, why didn't you start this post with explaining how you find outliers?
  • lpsatwork 1 day ago
    [dead]